Fusion Signage Pty Ltd ABN 19 644 714 081

About this statement

Fusion Signage Pty Ltd is not a reporting entity under the Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Cth). Our annual consolidated revenue is below the $100 million reporting threshold, and we have no obligation to prepare or lodge a modern slavery statement.

We publish this statement voluntarily. It has not been submitted to the Australian Government's Modern Slavery Statements Register. We have chosen to address the reporting criteria set out in the Act so that our customers, integrators and other partners can see how we think about these risks.

Because this statement is voluntary, it is not tied to a fixed reporting period or lodgement cycle. It reflects our position as at the approval date below, and we revisit it when our supply arrangements change, inparticular when our hardware suppliers or manufacturing arrangements change, rather than on a set calendar.

This statement describes our position accurately, including where our knowledge is incomplete.

Our structure, operations and supply chains

Fusion Signage is an Australian-owned private company based in Brisbane, Australia. We develop and operate a digital signage software platform, sold to end users through a network of resellers and channel partners.

Our operations are conducted from Australia. Our people are engaged directly on Australian employment terms and are covered by Australian workplace law, including the Fair Work Act 2009.

Our supply chain has two distinct parts:

Software and services. Our platform runs on Amazon Web Services. We use a range of established software and professional services suppliers, predominantly headquartered in Australia, the United States and the European Union. We hold ISO 27001:2022 certification and a SOC 2 Type II report, and we maintain a vendor register with associated risk assessments as part of those programmes.

Hardware. We sell Fusion Signage branded media players. These are produced to our specification by a single contract manufacturer based in Shenzhen, China, and imported into Australia. That supplier performs final assembly, firmware installation, functional testing and quality control at its own facility. The surface mount (SMT) stage of production is subcontracted by our supplier to a separate manufacturing partner. We do not operate any manufacturing facilities.

Modern slavery risks in our operations and supply chains

Our own operations - low risk: Our workforce is small, directly employed, Australian-based and professionally skilled. We do not use labour hire, seasonal labour or low-skilled contract labour.

Software and services supply chain- low risk: These suppliers are large, established firms in jurisdictions with mature labour regulation. Modern slavery risk exists in the manufacture of the underlying data centre hardware, but this is several tiers removed from us and we have no practical leverage over it.

Hardware supply chain - our principal exposure: Consumer electronics manufacturing in China is widely recognised as a higher-risk sector for modern slavery. The risks we consider relevant are the use of labour dispatch and agency workers, student internship programmes used as production labour, recruitment fees and wage deductions capable of creating debt bondage among internal migrant workers, and forced labour in upstream component supply chains.

We have engaged our manufacturer directly on these questions. Their written responses confirmed that:

• The facility performing assembly, firmware flashing, testing and quality control employs approximately seven to eight people.
• No labour dispatch workers, agency workers or student interns are used in production.
• Workers are not required to pay recruitment fees, and wages are not subject to deductions for recruitment or agency costs.
• Overtime is voluntary, and working hours are managed under applicable local labour regulations.
• The supplier has no operations or labour recruitment connected to Xinjiang or to government labour transfer programmes.
• An internal channel exists through which employees can raise workplace concerns.

We regard this as a reasonable outcome at the assembly tier. A facility of that size does not exhibit the structural conditions most commonly associated with forced labour in Chinese electronics manufacturing, which are characteristic of large-scale plants.

We are equally clear about what remains unresolved:

• These are self-declared responses. Our supplier holds no SMETA, BSCI, SA8000 or RBA VAP audit, and we have not independently verified the declarations.
• The declarations cover our supplier's own facility. The SMT manufacturing partner has not yet been identified to us, and we hold no information about labour conditions at that facility, which is likely to be larger than the assembly operation.
• We have no visibility into component and raw material sourcing beyond the SMT tier, and no practical leverage at that level.

We have not identified any actual instance of modern slavery in our operations or supply chains. We do not treat the absence of a finding as assurance, particularly below the assembly tier.

Given our scale, our order volumes and our limited commercial leverage, we consider direct engagement and written supplier declarations a proportionate first step. We do not consider them a substitute for verification where risk indicators warrant it.

Actions we have taken

• Identified imported media player hardware as our principal modern slavery exposure and recorded it in our internal risk process.
• Issued a written modern slavery and labour practices enquiry to our contract manufacturer covering facility identity, dispatch and agency labour, recruitment fees, working hours, Xinjiang exposure, grievance mechanisms and social compliance audit status, and received a substantive written response.
• Obtained our supplier's agreement to modern slavery terms in our purchase arrangements.
• Assessed our software and services supply chain against our existing vendor risk register.
• Maintained an internal channel through which our staff can raise concerns about conduct in our operations or supply chain.

We have not conducted supplier audits, supplier training or on-site inspections, and we do not claim a formal due diligence programme.

Our position on further measures

We have considered whether measures beyond direct supplier engagement are warranted, and do not regard them as proportionate to our scale, order volumes and commercial leverage at present. We hold no independent audit assurance over our hardware supply chain, and we have not sought it.

We would reconsider that position if we became aware of a credible risk indicator concerning our supplier or its subcontractors, if our hardware volumes grew materially, or if the structure of our supply chain changed.

How we reached this assessment

Our assessment rests on direct written engagement with our hardware supplier, our existing vendor risk register maintained under our ISO 27001 and SOC 2 programmes, and our internal risk process.

We recognise the limits of that basis. Our supplier's responses are self-declared and unverified by any independent audit. They describe conditions at the assembly facility only, and we hold no information about the subcontracted SMT stage or about component sourcing below it.

No concern relating to modern slavery has been raised through our internal reporting channel.

Consultation

Fusion Signage Pty Ltd does not own or control any other entities, so no consultation with controlled entities was required.

Approval

This statement was approved by the Managing Director of Fusion Signage Pty Ltd on Sep 17, 2026.

James Ingram
Managing Director
Fusion Signage Pty Ltd
Sep 17, 2026